Showing posts with label auckland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label auckland. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

30 Days Down Under - Part 8 - Auckland

Our Introduction to Auckland


The two hour flight from Queenstown to Auckland went by too quickly ... we spent the time with our seatmate, a young guy from Belgium, showing each other photos of his two week adventures on the south part of the South Island and some of the highlights of our trip.  We put our phones away, said our goodbyes, and made our way to our B&B near Mount Eden in Auckland.

The summit of Auckland's highest point, Mt. Eden, was about 1.7 miles from our bed and breakfast so we wandered over and traipsed up to see its view of Auckland - and its volcanic crater (Te Ipu-a-Mataaho - “The Bowl of Mataaho”). It's a simple bowl covered by grass, a part of which is seen here from a high point on its rim.



We're from the Pacific Northwest, so are used to volcanoes. Oregon has about 19, the State of Washington about 10 ... many of them are high, snow covered and glaciated peaks. In the state of Washington four of them are considered amongst the potentially most dangerous in the US, with one, Mt. Rainier near Seattle, in the Decade List - considered amongst the 17 potentially most destructive volcanoes in the world. (See comments about Washington volcanoes here)

Auckland dwarfs the US Pacific Northwest (in numbers, not at all in height). Auckland has between 49 and 53 volcanoes in its immediate area!!! Whereas in the northwest many are spectacular - high glaciated peaks, the ones around Auckland are much more mundane - many are barely noticeable and many have been quarried into oblivion.  One of the differences between the two areas: in the Northwest the most likely next eruptions will come from one of the existing peaks likely after warning by rumbling quake series, whereas in Auckland the most likely next  eruptions will come from a new location without  much warning   See about Auckland volcanoes here

One day we spent many hours in the Auckland War Memorial Museum - a bit of a misnomer ... it's a great collection of Maori, cultural, and natural  history, amongst other things. And it has a series of exhibits on volcanism, earthquakes, and the pacific rim ... wow, I had known the area of New Zealand was very active, but had not understood how very geologically active it was. A good article on Auckland's volcanoes is by the Ministry of Civil Defence here.

Amidst the displays was a section describing the volcanic (and earthquake) risk in Auckland and the rest of New Zealand. It also described the extensive planning that the government of New Zealand has instituted and the insurance for both earthquake and volcanoes that the government provides.  It puts to shame Seattle's lack of planning, and the paucity of reasonably affordable disaster insurance available in the US. Imagine: a nation that plans ahead of time to take care of its populace! New Zealand.

Click on any photo in the blog to enlarge it























Maori


It was the Maori and Pacific Islanders exhibits at the museum that attracted us the most.

Here's a model in the museum picturing a prototypical Maori Pa.  The Maori were competitive and warlike, with tribes fighting tribes and building pa's - fortified settlements for protection.  Mt. Eden in present-day Auckland was once a terraced and fortified pa.

The Maori were quite the opposite of the aboriginals in the Australian outback who were peaceable.

Perhaps when people are faced with a harsh environment in which survival is difficult, they are more humane and understanding of others' needs to endure and survive, than when they are in a fortunate environment that is plentiful, where they can afford the luxury of competition and greed.

Maybe that's why many people undergoing hardship tend to be so willing to help their neighbors and others.

For the most successful of the Maori's they could afford large storehouses like the one (from a fairly late vintage) in the museum.

Te Ara is an excellent site for New Zealand's history, culture, and politics including that of the Maori's, at https://teara.govt.nz/en You could (should) get lost for months exploring it in much more depth than I could ever manage.


Maori masks, carved in wood or soapstone, were used to honor the dead; they reproduced the ta moko - the markings - that had adorned the ancestors.

For a fascinating read see the story of Whakairo - Maori carving here.

And for an even more fascinating read, see the story of Ta Moko, Maori "tattooing" here. The word "tattooing" is a bit of a misnomer. The technique used was not at all like a modern day tattoo, nor did it feel as gentle as tattooing when it was applied.  The grooves were chiseled into the skin using chisels producing deep incisions in the skin rather than the pinpricks of modern-day tattoos.  I wonder how popular tattoos would be today if the same methods were used.

If (when?) I ever get a tattoo I'd pick a Maori design, at least as close to one as Maori traditions allow. But I certainly would not want it done the Maori way.




Other fascinating articles about Maori culture are about Maori kites here (yes, they flew kites), and their religion here, and what some Victorians would prudishly call their morals here (the latter being very apropos to same sex marriage that the people of Australia just voted 61.6% to 38.4% to allow.)



The museum also contains exhibits of polynesia and the Pacific Islands, to which New Zealand is bound both geographically, historically, and culturally.

New Zealand's population as of 2013 was 74% European, 14.9% Maori, 11.8% Asian, and 7.4% Pacific Islanders. (per Wikipedia)

And with that, we're off to an island.







Train to Waiheke Island



Early one morning it took us only a little over 10 minutes to walk from our B&B in the Mount Eden neighborhood, past Eden Park (Auckland's major stadium where the All Blacks play - that rugby team is New Zealand's pride - their stuff is sold everywhere in NZ, just simply everywhere, you can't escape it) to the nearby Kingsland rail station.  There are convenient, new, clean, fast trains roughly every 20 to 30 minutes to Britomart, the major downtown rail station at the harbor.

Like in Sydney, a massive rail terminal and pedestrian precinct was under construction along the harbour.  Somehow we found our way through the construction (the wayfinding sucked in comparison to Sydney) to the old but classic brick Ferry Terminal building.

From there we caught Fuller's ferry for its 40 minute trip to Waiheke Island. It gave us a good view of downtown Auckland and its ferry terminal - a scaled down version of Sydney's Circular Quay.

(map from Open Street Map under its open license)


















Our destination was to visit a close friend who lives on the far east side of Waiheke Island in her family's home, which the family had first built in about 1900.  At that time it was exceedingly remote - the only way to the home was by boat or horseback (or trekking) from the western end of the island .


Waiheke Island is undergoing a quick change - our journey the length of the island was a journey through that change. The ferry docks near the western end of the island.  That end seems a bit like Sausalito or Tiburon on the north shore of San Francisco bay - manicured, pleasant, with any property likely costing a fortune. Taking the road eastward one passes a mix of exurban sprawl - remaining older homes and stores, many seeming from the 50's and 60's when lots of young people were living cheap away from the city, amidst many new and obviously expensive houses and condos.

As the road proceeds west it becomes a bit more rural, with several wineries set amongst their vineyards - a favorite Auckland destination for a day of sipping wine. Eventually the main road comes to Onetangi Beach. From there smaller roads continue east to a mix of parks with popular day hikes and various rural properties, both old and new.

Throughout the island there are frequent views over the multi-fingered coastline and its  inlets and bays.


The view from our friend's yard's gate. The house was down a path about 50 yards from the end of her shared rough drive, which required a 4 wheel drive steeply wind its way up to the road.





Sunday, October 29, 2017

30 Days Down Under - Part 1 - Overview & Index

The traveller's dilemma

If you're going to fly over 16,000 miles round trip, and likely won't get a chance to be back again, you're faced with that inevitable dilemma: do you experience a few places - maybe just one - and experience them in more depth, or do you experience as many places as you can, but much more superficially.

Australia is BIG.  Click here to compare size
How does one begin to choose?

For better or worse, we decided to experience as many different places as we could while remaining at least a few days in each place - a whirlwind "taster".  So for the most part we limited ourselves to a minimum of 3 days, 4 nights in each location (always leaving a full day in between for traveling - that usually left us an "extra" afternoon or morning)

Since we're in our mid 70's, it's unlikely we'll get a chance to return. But if we do, we'll face another dilemma: which of the places should we explore more?  ALL of them are vying for more exploration.

Us in Sydney (photo by Graeme of "Bike Buffs - Sydney Bike Tours")

Us (Me and Ginny) at Circular Quay in Sydney

Australia and New Zealand Trip Summary

This overview will summarize our trip, to be followed by more detailed comments about each place, in separate subsequent parts. (With apologies in advance: the various parts may be finished more slowly than I'd like.  Check back as subsequent parts get added)

We wanted to visit the hot areas in Australia, but wanted to avoid the heat.  We also wanted to visit the cooler, wetter areas of Tasmania and south New Zealand, but wanted to avoid inclement weather.  The compromise: go in mid spring (late Sept. and most of October); visit the hotter areas before they heat up, and the cooler areas later, hopefully after their weather has moderated.

Day 1-2 - Fly Seattle to San Francisco to Sydney
Days 3-6 Sydney (incl. the day that we arrive, jet-lagged, at 7 AM) (for part 2 Sydney click here)
     Highlights: Bike tour of Sydney, experiencing a multi-cultural world-class city
     Regret: Didn't spend several days in the Blue Mountains
Sydney Harbor from Harbour Bridge
Day 7 - Fly Sydney to Uluru
Days 8-9 - Uluru (For part 3 - Uluru - click here)
     Highlight: Experiencing and circumnavigating Uluru by foot
     Regret: Didn't spend a couple of days or more in the outback
First view of Uluru - formerly known as Ayers Rock before reverting to its indigenous name

Day 10 - fly Uluru to Cairns, drive to Port Douglas
Days 11-13 - Port Douglas, The Great Barrier Reef, the Daintree (for part 4 click here)
     Highlight: The Daintree Rainforest
     Regret: Didn't spend more time in the rain forest
Under the Daintree Rainforest canopy - a UNESCO World Heritage site

Day 14 - drive Port Douglas to Cairns, fly to Melbourne
Days 15-16 - Melbourne (see Part 5 here)
     Highlight: A grand city
     Regret: Didn't spend enough time here, nor did we get to Phillips Island
Flying in to Melbourne

Day 17 - fly Melbourne to Holbart
Days 18-20 - Hobart Tasmania and Port Arthur (see part 6 here)
    Highlights: Port Arthur and stumbling on Jamie Maslin and his book "The Long Hitch Home"
    Regret: Didn't spend much more time exploring Tasmania
On the boat from Hobart to the (in)famous MONA - The Museum of Old and New Art

Days 21-22 - Fly Hobart to Sydney to Queenstown
Days 23-25 - Queenstown New Zealand (see part 7 here)
     Highlights: Milford Sound, bicycling to Gibbston Valley, watching bungy jumping
     Regret: not spending 2 weeks exploring the South Island and not being Jack Benny's age
Milford Sound Day Trip - A rarity - it was sunny!

Day 26 - Fly Queenstown to Auckland
Days 27-29 - Auckland (see part 8 here)
     Highlights: visiting a friend's family's 110 year old farm on the far east end of Waiheke Island
     Regret: not spending more time exploring more of New Zealand's north island
Day 30 -Fly Auckland - San Francisco - Seattle
Auckland skyline from top of Mt. Eden

Update Mar 11, 2018:

While planning our trip we read the book "The Fatal Shore" by Robert Hughes about the founding of Australia.  A very insightful book review from the New York Times comparing the founding of Australia with the founding of the U.S. is here

Just today I learned of another book that we should have read when planning the trip: "A Long Way From Home" by Peter Carey ... a novel about a trio of Australians wending their way through Australia discovering things they had never known about their country. A book review is here


A Random Subjective Impression

Coming from Seattle, perhaps the fastest growing city in the US and maybe one of the richest, a particularly stark difference stood out. In Seattle you can not miss the homeless ... they are everywhere ... camping in tents or makeshift shelters, in encampments in most any unused piece of land, in parks, and sleeping rough in downtown doorways and under bridges.

In our trip in Australia we saw only two homeless people and no homeless tents or encampments.  Although we were in a wide variety of areas (not just normal tourist areas), some of this may be the result of when and where we were. But statistics help bolster my observation.

Washington State, the American state that Seattle is in, has a population of about 7.28 million, of which about 22,000 (0.30%) are homeless.

New South Wales, the Australian state that Sydney is in, has a population of about 7.7 million, of which about 28,200 (0.37%) are "homeless".
Both are seemingly similar..
...But...
The definitions of homeless are not comparable. Australia considers homelessness much more broadly than the US - the figures for New South Wales are broken down as:
  • Rough sleeping: 7% of the homeless
  • Supported accommodation for the homeless (shelters): 18% of the homeless
  • Boarding Houses: 23% of the homeless
  • Overcrowded dwellings: 34% of the homeless
  • Staying with other households: 18% of the homeless
  • Other temporary accommodation: 1% of the homeless

In the US, generally only the first 2 categories (in red) are talked about as homeless.

The sbove suggests that Washington State has about 3 times the number of homeless sleeping rough or in tents or in shelters as does New South Wales (22,000 vs 7,700)

Why the difference?
  • Both have a recent history of ferociously rising housing, property, and rental costs.
  • Both seem to have lots of drug use (sharps disposals were in most public rest rooms in AU)
  • Both have roughly equal unemployment rates (NSW = 4.6% and Washington State = 4.5%) 

I mentioned my observation to a number of people in AU and we speculated why:
  • Australia has a more developed safety net
  • Australia has universal healthcare, including mental health care
  • Australia has much higher wages for the lowest paid employees.  As of 2016: Australia minimum wage: $AU 17.70/hr = ~ $US 12.27 compared to US minimum wage of $US 7.25/hr - and in the US tips count toward the minimum wage, reducing it even further.(in Seattle $11.50/hr to $13.50/hr depending on size of employer)
  • Australia has much less income inequality than the US. Per Credit Suisse, Australia ranks # 2, and the US # 21 (alongside Greece and Austria) for mean wealth per person (a good indication of income inequality) See this article from MSN Money
  • A taxi driver mentioned that the starting salary for a beginning waitress is Sydney would be about $20/hr.
I did notice that almost everything seemed to be more expensive in Sydney than Seattle.  But if that's the price of paying people a living wage, and having a better standard of living for workers, it's a price worth paying.  In the US we have good reason for feeling guilty if not tipping heavily. In Australia the norm appeared to be "tipping is not necessary".

I happened upon this relevant article about homelessness:

Mark Twain once observed: "Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please."
A one month vacation certainly doesn't qualify as "Getting your facts", so the distortion part is easy. But the stark differences should be explored in more depth.

Unfortunately, as Alexis de Tocqueville observed in his book "Democracy in America" about his travels to the US: “everybody feels the evil, but no one has courage or energy enough to seek the cure”.